<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" 
   xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/html" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" 
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
<channel>
   <title>Fer's blog</title>
   <link>http://www.gnome.org/~fherrera/blog</link>
   <description>fer, ferulo, that crazy man</description>
   <language>en</language>
   <copyright>Copyright 2006 Fernando Herrera</copyright>
   <ttl>60</ttl>
   <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 15:52 GMT</pubDate>
   <managingEditor>fherrera@onirica.com</managingEditor>
   <generator>PyBlosxom http://pyblosxom.sourceforge.net/ 1.3.2 2/13/2006</generator>
<item>
   <title>Gtk+ performance</title>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">gtk_performance</guid>
   <link>http://www.gnome.org/~fherrera/blog/gtk_performance.html</link>
   <description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://blogs.gnome.org/xan">Xan</a> has been measuring gtk+ performance on ARM using some different gtk+ flavours:<ul><li>maemo-gtk (2.6)</li><li>stock gtk+ 2.10 + stock cairo</li><li>gtk+ 2.10 patched to use XFT for text rendering</li><li>gtk+ 2.10 + cairo patched to use the magic number tecnique for the fixed_from_double</li></ul>Interesting results. Read it: <a href="http://blogs.gnome.org/view/xan/2006/11/06/0">Gtk+ Performance Measurement (I)</a></p>

]]></description>
   <category domain="http://www.gnome.org/~fherrera/blog">main</category>
   <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 15:52 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
