<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Fer's blog</title>
	<link>http://www.gnome.org/~fherrera/blog/2006/Nov/06/</link>
	<description>fer, ferulo, that crazy man</description>
	<language>en</language>
	<managingEditor>fherrea@onrica.com</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>fherrera@onirica.com</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>Gtk+ performance</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gnome.org/~fherrera/blog/2006/Nov/06//gtk_performance</guid>
		<description><p><a href="http://blogs.gnome.org/xan">Xan</a> has been measuring gtk+ performance on ARM using some different gtk+ flavours:<ul><li>maemo-gtk (2.6)</li><li>stock gtk+ 2.10 + stock cairo</li><li>gtk+ 2.10 patched to use XFT for text rendering</li><li>gtk+ 2.10 + cairo patched to use the magic number tecnique for the fixed_from_double</li></ul>Interesting results. Read it: <a href="http://blogs.gnome.org/view/xan/2006/11/06/0">Gtk+ Performance Measurement (I)</a></p>
</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 15:52 -0400</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
